AviationGrade AviationGrade
Separation
Air Regulations · Chapter 10

Separation

Separation system and vertical minima

15 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Regulations ch 10, with the CAE Oxford Air Law manual for depth, DGCA scope only

Separation keeps controlled aircraft apart by a prescribed minimum. ATC may use a vertical difference, horizontal spacing or an authorised combination, and must establish a replacement before the existing method becomes insufficient.

Where ATC provides separation

Airspace or operationFlights separated
Classes A and BAll flights admitted to the class
Classes C, D and EIFR from IFR
Class CIFR from VFR
Special VFRIFR from Special VFR, and Special VFR from Special VFR when prescribed

Vertical, horizontal and composite separation

Vertical separation assigns different levels. Horizontal separation keeps aircraft apart laterally, longitudinally or by surveillance distance. Composite separation combines vertical and horizontal elements whose minima may each be reduced, but never below half of the individual minimum. Composite separation is used only under an applicable regional air-navigation agreement.

Vertical separation minimum

Level bandMinimumCondition
Below FL 2901,000 ftNormal vertical separation minimum
FL 290 through FL 4101,000 ftBoth aircraft RVSM compliant and operating in designated RVSM airspace
At or above FL 290 outside RVSM conditions2,000 ftUsed when the reduced minimum is not authorised or cannot be maintained
Above FL 4102,000 ftNormal high-level minimum under the applicable cruising-level scheme

Assigning a vacated level

An aircraft may normally be cleared to a level after another aircraft reports vacating it. The clearance is withheld until the first aircraft reports at or passing another level separated by the required minimum when severe turbulence exists, both aircraft are in the same holding pattern, or their performance difference could erode separation.

Own separation in VMC

At a pilot's request, with the other pilot's agreement and ATC authorisation, an IFR flight in Class D or E may climb or descend in daylight VMC while maintaining its own separation from one other aircraft. The clearance is for a specified portion at or below 10,000 ft. Essential traffic information is passed, and ATC gives an alternative instruction in case VMC cannot be maintained.

Cruise climb

Bali states that cruise climb is not permitted in Indian FIRs. A clearance must assign a level or level band permitted by the applicable procedure rather than assume an unrestricted cruise climb.

Interactive Vertical separation by flight level
Selected levelFL 250
Required vertical spacing1,000 ft
The two aircraft remain on a true vertical scale. The second aircraft moves to the next permissible level as the selected flight level crosses RVSM boundaries.
RVSM is conditionalFL 290 to FL 410 does not automatically mean 1,000 ft. Both aircraft and the operation must be RVSM compliant in designated RVSM airspace.

Lateral separation by position and track

14 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Regulations ch 10, with the CAE Oxford Air Law manual for depth, DGCA scope only

Lateral separation proves that protected route areas do not overlap. The proof may come from positive position reports, divergent tracks from a common navigation aid or independently protected navigation paths.

Geographical separation

Aircraft are laterally separated when position reports positively place them over different geographical locations whose protected areas do not overlap. The locations may be determined visually or by reference to a navigation aid.

Divergence from the same facility

Navigation basisMinimum track divergenceAdditional condition
VOR15 degreesBoth established on diverging radials and at least one aircraft 15 NM or more from the facility
NDB30 degreesBoth established on tracks to or from the NDB, at least one aircraft 15 NM or more from the facility and at least 20 degrees from the other aircraft's reference radial
GNSS to GNSS15 to 135 degrees measured at the common pointBoth established with zero offset and at least one aircraft at the prescribed distance from the common point
VOR to GNSS15 to 135 degrees measured at the common pointVOR aircraft established on its radial, GNSS aircraft on a zero-offset track and the prescribed distance achieved

GNSS distance before separation exists

For a divergence between 15 and 135 degrees, Bali uses 15 NM from the common point from FL 010 through FL 190, and 23 NM from FL 200 through FL 600. These are ground distances. When DME supplies distance, the controller accounts for slant range.

Integrity and offsets

Before applying GNSS track separation, ATC confirms that the aircraft is navigating by GNSS and is not applying an authorised strategic lateral offset. GNSS separation is not used after a reported RAIM outage. When aircraft use different aids or RNAV methods, their protected airspaces or applicable RNP containment areas must not overlap.

Angle plus distanceTrack divergence alone is not enough. The prescribed distance from the common facility or point must also be achieved before lateral separation exists.

Track relationships and longitudinal separation

13 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Regulations ch 10, with the CAE Oxford Air Law manual for depth, DGCA scope only

Longitudinal separation protects aircraft one behind another or approaching a common point. Before choosing a time or distance minimum, the controller classifies the angular relationship between the tracks.

Track definitions

RelationshipAngular differenceMeaning
Same trackLess than 45 degrees or more than 315 degreesSame-direction tracks, including intersecting portions, whose protection areas overlap
Reciprocal tracksMore than 135 degrees but less than 225 degreesOpposite or nearly opposite tracks whose protection areas overlap
Crossing tracksAll other intersecting relationshipsTracks outside the same and reciprocal sectors

Longitudinal separation is applied so that the estimated positions of the aircraft never become closer than the prescribed minimum. It may be established by assigning departure times, requiring aircraft to pass a point at stated times, holding an aircraft over a point, assigning an appropriate level change or maintaining a stated distance.

Time-based information

Time separation can use positions and estimates received by voice, CPDLC or ADS-C. Every calculation is cross-checked against the traffic geometry, because a correct subtraction applied to the wrong order of aircraft is still unsafe.

Interactive Same, crossing or reciprocal track
Angular difference020 degrees
RelationshipSame track
The second track rotates continuously about the common point. The shaded sectors remain fixed at the 45, 135, 225 and 315 degree boundaries.
Crossing is the remainderFirst test the same-track sector, then the reciprocal sector. Every other intersecting relationship is a crossing track.

Time-based longitudinal minima

17 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Regulations ch 10, with the CAE Oxford Air Law manual for depth, DGCA scope only

The basic procedural time interval is 15 minutes. It reduces only when position and speed can be checked more frequently, or when the leading aircraft has enough speed advantage and the geometry meets the stated conditions.

Aircraft at the same cruising level

SituationMinimumConditions
Same track15 minutesBasic minimum
Same track10 minutesNavigation aids permit frequent determination of position and speed
Same track5 minutesLeader at least 20 kt faster; both departed same aerodrome, reported over same point, or departure joins the route with five minutes assured
Same track3 minutesSame geometry as the five-minute case, but leader at least 40 kt faster
Crossing tracks15 minutesBasic minimum at the crossing point
Crossing tracks10 minutesFrequent position and speed determination available

Aircraft climbing or descending

RelationshipMinimum while vertical separation does not exist
Same track15 minutes, reducible to 10 minutes with frequent position and speed determination
Same track, common reporting point5 minutes when the level change starts within 10 minutes of the second aircraft's report over that point
Crossing tracks15 minutes before and after estimated crossing, reducible to 10 minutes with frequent position and speed determination
Crossing tracks, common point5 minutes when the level change starts within 10 minutes of the second aircraft's report and any indirect clearance states that restriction
Reciprocal tracksVertical separation for at least 10 minutes before and after estimated passing when lateral separation is absent

A clearance transmitted through a third party or by CPDLC includes the restriction needed to preserve the timing condition. The controller does not assume that a level change began at the instant the clearance was issued.

Speed advantage belongs to the leaderThe three-minute and five-minute same-level reductions require the preceding aircraft to be faster. A faster following aircraft would close the gap and defeat the logic.

DME, GNSS and surveillance separation

16 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Regulations ch 10, with the CAE Oxford Air Law manual for depth, DGCA scope only

Distance-based separation replaces estimates with simultaneous measured distances. The measurements must refer to the same on-track DME station, the same waypoint or a collocated DME and waypoint.

Common-reference conditions

Both aircraft may use DME, both may use GNSS, or one may use each system. Direct controller-to-pilot VHF communication is maintained. Measurements are obtained simultaneously and often enough to confirm that the minimum will not be infringed. When area-navigation aircraft are involved, the controller specifically requests GNSS-derived distance.

GeometryMinimumCondition
Same level, same track20 NMCommon on-track reference and frequent simultaneous readings
Same level, same track10 NMLeader maintains at least 20 kt true-airspeed advantage
Same level, crossing tracks20 NMReference at crossing point, relative angle below 90 degrees and frequent checks
Same level, crossing tracks10 NMSame conditions plus leader at least 20 kt faster
Climbing or descending, same track10 NMOne aircraft maintains a level while vertical separation does not exist
Reciprocal tracks10 NM after passingPositive proof that the aircraft have passed each other

When GNSS distance cannot be used

Loss of GNSS integrity, inadequate airborne equipment or loss of the GNSS input to an integrated navigation system requires another form of separation. A GNSS distance from an integrated system is acceptable only when the system provides the required integrity.

ATS surveillance minima in India

Bali states a normal horizontal surveillance minimum of 5 NM. A 3 NM minimum may be specifically authorised within suitable coverage for Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Kolkata and Shamshabad radars. When ADS-B or MLAT is combined with radar, the applicable minimum is the radar minimum. MLAT used alone follows the minimum prescribed before implementation.

Distance reports share a referenceTwo accurate distances from different unrelated facilities do not prove spacing. Both reports must resolve the aircraft against a common on-track reference.

Mach number and performance-based separation

15 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Regulations ch 10, with the CAE Oxford Air Law manual for depth, DGCA scope only

Mach number technique stabilises relative speed between turbojet aircraft on the same track where surveillance is limited. Performance-based minima then connect navigation, communication and surveillance capability to a permitted spacing.

Mach number technique

Each aircraft agrees to maintain the Mach number assigned by ATC for the specified segment, normally to within Mach 0.01. No speed change is made without clearance unless an emergency requires it. Position reports are supplied at compulsory points by the available long-range communication system.

Preceding aircraft speed advantageTypical time interval stated by Bali
At least Mach 0.02 faster10 minutes
At least Mach 0.03 faster9 minutes
At least Mach 0.04 faster8 minutes

The exact value depends on the applicable Doc 4444 and FIR procedure. On suitable designated RNAV or VOR-defined routes, an 80 NM RNAV distance minimum with Mach number technique may replace the 10-minute interval.

RNP, RCP and RSP

RNP specifies navigation containment. RCP specifies communication transaction performance, including the time for an instruction to reach the aircraft and its acknowledgement to return. RSP specifies surveillance-delivery performance from the service-provider interface to the ATS processing and display system. Performance-based communication and surveillance use these specifications with the aircraft, ground system and operating procedures as one complete chain.

SeparationRNPRCPRSPMaximum ADS-C periodic interval
50 NM1024018027 minutes
50 NM424018032 minutes
30 NM2 or 424018012 minutes
5 minutes2, 4 or 1024018014 minutes

These minima apply only when every required approval, capability and reporting condition is satisfied. If a required performance element is lost, ATC establishes a different valid minimum.

Performance is a complete chainAn aircraft capability entry alone is insufficient. The airspace, ground system, communication path, surveillance delivery and operating approval must support the declared specification.

Wake turbulence categories and spacing

16 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Regulations ch 10, with the CAE Oxford Air Law manual for depth, DGCA scope only

A lifting wing sheds counter-rotating vortices from rotation until touchdown. The strongest operational hazard is produced by a heavy aircraft flying slowly, and the following aircraft is most vulnerable when it is lighter, lower and close behind.

Wake categories

CategoryCodeMaximum take-off mass basis
SUPERJAn aircraft type specifically designated SUPER, currently represented operationally by the A380-800; not a general mass band
HEAVYH136,000 kg or more, except an aircraft designated SUPER
MEDIUMMMore than 7,000 kg but less than 136,000 kg
LIGHTL7,000 kg or less

Procedural time spacing

OperationFollowing relationshipMinimum
Timed approachMedium behind Heavy2 minutes
Timed approachLight behind Heavy or Medium3 minutes
Departure from same runway or related parallel or crossing geometryLight or Medium behind Heavy, or Light behind Medium2 minutes
Departure from an intermediate pointLight or Medium behind Heavy, or Light behind Medium3 minutes
Displaced-threshold or opposite-direction conflict described in the procedureLighter aircraft exposed to the heavier aircraft's path2 minutes

For a SUPER aircraft, the current AIP and controller procedure provides the applicable time minimum. The category word SUPER or HEAVY is included with the call sign on initial contact where required.

Surveillance wake spacing on approach and departure

LeadingFollowingMinimum
SUPERHEAVY6 NM
SUPERMEDIUM7 NM
SUPERLIGHT8 NM
HEAVYHEAVY4 NM
HEAVYMEDIUM5 NM
HEAVYLIGHT6 NM
MEDIUMLIGHT5 NM
Interactive Wake category and trailing distance
PairHeavy followed by Heavy
Surveillance spacing4 NM
Tap a category pair. The follower moves to the correct plotted distance behind the leader while the wake corridor remains aligned with the leader's track.
Wake is not ordinary radar spacingThe basic surveillance minimum does not cancel a larger wake minimum. The larger applicable value governs.

Maintaining, changing and restoring separation

13 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Regulations ch 10, with the CAE Oxford Air Law manual for depth, DGCA scope only

A separation minimum is a live condition, not a one-time calculation. The controller monitors the geometry, predicts where the current method will cease to work and establishes the next valid method before that point.

Loss or change of the current method

If the navigation aid, communication, surveillance source, aircraft performance or route geometry needed for a minimum is lost, ATC acts before the minimum is infringed. It may stop a level change, issue vectors, assign another level, change speed, increase longitudinal spacing or revert to a larger procedural minimum.

Transfer and pilot-maintained separation

Transfer of control between ATS units does not create a gap in separation responsibility. The agreed transfer condition specifies the aircraft position, level, clearance and any restriction still in force. Responsibility changes only at the coordinated point or time. A pilot accepts responsibility for separation from one named aircraft only under an authorised visual-separation procedure and after reporting the traffic in sight or agreeing to the stated VMC condition.

Essential traffic information

Essential traffic is controlled traffic to which separation applies but which is not, or will not be, separated from another controlled flight by the required minimum. ATC gives both flights the information needed to understand the conflict, normally including direction, aircraft type and wake category when relevant, level and the estimated position or time of closest approach. Information does not by itself establish separation.

Operational sequence

StepController logic
1. Identify obligationConfirm which flights must be separated under the airspace class and operation.
2. Select methodChoose vertical, lateral, longitudinal, surveillance or authorised composite separation.
3. Verify prerequisitesCheck navigation source, common reference, communication, performance approval, track geometry and wake category.
4. Apply the minimumIssue a clearance early enough for the aircraft to achieve and maintain the required value.
5. MonitorCross-check reports or surveillance and predict closure, level crossing and geometry change.
6. Replace before failureEstablish another valid method before the current separation becomes insufficient.

Common exam traps

  • Do not use 1,000 ft above FL 290 unless RVSM conditions are satisfied.
  • Do not reduce a time minimum unless every speed, reporting and common-point condition is met.
  • Do not mix distances from unrelated DME stations.
  • Do not confuse traffic information with ATC separation.
  • Do not apply a smaller surveillance minimum when wake turbulence requires more.
  • Do not authorise cruise climb in an Indian FIR.
Build the next barrier firstSeparation remains safe when the next valid method is established before the old one disappears. Waiting for a minimum to be lost is already too late.