AviationGrade AviationGrade
Lambert's Conformal Chart: Part 2
General Navigation · Chapter 12

Lambert's Conformal Chart: Part 2

How constant is Lambert scale?

11 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Navigation ch 3, Lambert scaleOxford ATPL Book 10, chapter 22

A Lambert chart is not perfectly constant scale, but careful selection of its standard parallels can hold the scale error within a small operational limit.

The one-percent convention

For practical navigation, a chart may be treated as constant scale when distortion does not exceed about 1 percent. Distance measured with a ruler will then be within about 1 percent of the value obtained from the exact local scale. Always use the published chart information if greater precision is required.

Separation of the standard parallels

Scale is correct at the two standard parallels, contracted between them and expanded outside them. Increasing their separation increases the maximum scale error. Oxford gives the following guide for a Lambert sheet.

Latitude difference between standard parallelsApproximate maximum scale error
5⅓°0.1%
16°1%
23°2%
28°3%
32°4%
Interactive Standard-parallel spacing and scale error
Separation16.0°
Approximate maximum scale error1.0%
Move the standard parallels apart. The guide curve follows the scale-error values tabulated in the Oxford chapter.
WordingLambert is near constant scale, not exactly constant scale. Scale varies slightly with position.

Earth and chart convergence

13 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Navigation ch 3, convergence on LambertOxford ATPL Book 10, chapter 22

The difference between Earth convergency and Lambert chart convergence explains both track relationships and the slight curvature of a great circle on the chart.

Two distinct angles

Earth convergency is the change in inclination between two meridians on the Earth. It is also the change in direction of a great-circle track between those meridians. Chart convergence is the angle between the same two meridians on the chart, or the change in direction of a straight chart line as it crosses them.

Earth convergencyEarth convergency = change of longitude × sine mean latitude.
Lambert chart convergenceChart convergence = change of longitude × sine parallel of origin = change of longitude × n.

Half-angle relationships

The difference between a rhumb line and a great circle is the conversion angle, equal to half Earth convergency. The difference between a rhumb line and a straight line on the Lambert is half chart convergence.

ComparisonAngleFormula
Rhumb line to great circleConversion angle½ × change of longitude × sin mean latitude
Rhumb line to Lambert straight lineHalf chart convergence½ × change of longitude × sin parallel of origin
Great-circle curvature relative to straight lineDifference of the two half angles½ × change of longitude × (sin mean latitude minus sin parallel of origin)

Worked comparison

Take two meridians 20 degrees apart on a Lambert whose parallel of origin is 45 degrees north. Half chart convergence is ½ × 20 × sin 45 degrees = 7.071 degrees. At mean latitude 47 degrees, conversion angle is 7.314 degrees. At 45 degrees it is 7.071 degrees. At 43 degrees it is 6.820 degrees. Only at the parallel of origin are the two angles equal.

Key resultAt the parallel of origin, Earth convergency equals chart convergence and the Lambert straight line coincides most closely with the great circle.

Great circles and rhumb lines

13 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Navigation ch 3, route shapesOxford ATPL Book 10, chapter 22

On a Lambert chart, a great circle is very nearly straight. A rhumb line has much greater curvature and bends towards the pole of projection.

Great-circle shape

At the parallel of origin, a great circle is represented by a straight line in the east and west sense. At another latitude it is a shallow curve concave to the parallel of origin. The curvature is normally so small that a straight line between two positions is accepted as the great-circle track for practical plotting.

Rhumb-line shape

Meridians are the straight rhumb-line exception. Every other rhumb line curves concave to the pole of projection, which means concave to the parallels of latitude. It lies farther from the straight chord than the great circle does.

Interactive Route shapes around the parallel of origin
Mean latitude45° N
Great-circle shapeNearly coincident with the straight line
The parallel of origin is 45 degrees north. The great circle bends gently towards it, while the rhumb line curves more strongly towards the pole.
“Great circles can be treated as straight lines for all practical purposes.”Oxford ATPL Book 10, chapter 22
“Great circle is closest to a straight line at the parallel of origin.”R.K. Bali, Air Navigation, chapter 3
Curve directionThe great circle is concave to the parallel of origin. The rhumb line is concave to the pole of projection.

Mid-meridian track relationships

14 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Navigation ch 3, track relationshipsOxford ATPL Book 10, chapter 22

A straight line, the corresponding great circle and the corresponding rhumb line are parallel at the mid-meridian of a Lambert route.

The mid-meridian rule

At the halfway meridian, the straight-line track is taken as the mean great-circle track and equals the rhumb-line direction for the route. At either endpoint, the straight line changes direction from that mean by half chart convergence.

Straight-line endpoint trackEndpoint straight-line track = mid-meridian track plus or minus half chart convergence.

Straightening a great circle

A great circle can be represented by a practical straight line by applying conversion angle at an endpoint. Find the rhumb-line track, then move from it towards the pole by the conversion angle to obtain the initial great-circle track. On Lambert, the plotted straight line already approximates that great circle, so the remaining difference is normally very small.

Worked route, 250 degrees at A

A straight line from A to B measures 250 degrees true at A. Chart convergence is 6 degrees in the Northern Hemisphere. Half chart convergence is 3 degrees, so the rhumb-line track from A to B is 247 degrees true. Its reciprocal is 067 degrees. At B, the straight-line bearing of A is 067 minus 3 = 064 degrees true.

Worked mid-meridian route

A straight route crosses the mid-meridian at 300 degrees true and measures 302 degrees true at A. The rhumb-line track is 300 degrees true. The two-degree endpoint difference is half chart convergence, so full chart convergence is 4 degrees. The straight-line bearing of A from B is approximately 118 degrees true.

Place on routeStraight-line direction compared with rhumb line
First endpointDiffers by half chart convergence
Mid-meridianParallel to the rhumb line and great circle
Second endpointDiffers by half chart convergence in the opposite sense

Plotting positions and measuring distance

11 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Navigation ch 3, Lambert chartworkOxford ATPL Book 10, chapter 22

Lambert chartwork uses the curved graticule directly. Plot positions by interpolation, measure direction at the relevant meridian and measure distance along a graduated meridian.

Plotting a position

  1. Find the two meridians enclosing the required longitude and interpolate the longitude fraction.
  2. Find the two parallels enclosing the required latitude and interpolate the latitude fraction.
  3. Mark the intersection carefully, allowing for the curvature of both parallels.

Measuring a bearing

Place the protractor or plotter against the meridian at the point where the direction is required. A straight route's angle to north changes as it crosses converging meridians, so a bearing measured against a distant meridian is not the bearing at the point of interest.

Measuring distance

Use a graduated meridian, because one minute of latitude represents one nautical mile. For a short leg, use the scale near the leg's mean latitude. If scale error on the sheet is within the accepted limit, a chart ruler may be used. A long leg crossing appreciably different scale should be divided into shorter sections.

QuantityCorrect Lambert reference
LatitudeGraduated meridian
LongitudeInterpolation between enclosing meridians
Track or bearingMeridian at the point where the direction applies
DistanceLatitude graduations on a meridian near the leg
Indian chartworkOn Indian aeronautical charts, use the printed graticule and scale information on the actual sheet. Keep measurements local to the route because the designed standard parallels determine the sheet's scale pattern.

Plotting radio bearings

14 min read
Written fromOxford ATPL Book 10, chapter 22, bearing plotting

Radio waves follow great-circle paths. Lambert makes them nearly straight, but the reference meridian must match the place where the bearing was measured.

Bearings measured at the ground station

VDF and VOR bearings are referenced at the ground station. Correct magnetic bearing to true using variation at that station, then plot the true bearing from the station's meridian. No conversion angle is required because the radio path is already a great circle and is treated as straight on Lambert.

Bearings measured at the aircraft

ADF or NDB relative bearing, and an airborne weather-radar bearing, are measured at the aircraft. Add the aircraft's true heading to relative bearing to obtain the true great-circle bearing from the aircraft. When plotting the reciprocal from the NDB, draw a line through the NDB parallel to the aircraft's meridian and measure from that transferred reference. This automatically allows for chart convergence.

Interactive ADF meridian transfer
Chart convergence
Bearing from the NDB meridian243° T
The aircraft-derived reciprocal is 240 degrees true. Measure it from a line through the NDB parallel to the aircraft meridian, or add chart convergence when referencing the NDB meridian in this example.

Worked ADF example

An aircraft heads 330 degrees true and observes an NDB at relative bearing 090 degrees. The true bearing from aircraft to NDB is 060 degrees, so the reciprocal position line is 240 degrees. Plot 240 degrees from a line through the NDB parallel to the aircraft's meridian. If chart convergence is 3 degrees and the bearing must instead be measured from the NDB meridian, use 243 degrees true.

SystemWhere bearing is measuredVariation usedPlotting reference
VOR or VDFGround stationAt the ground stationStation meridian
ADF or NDBAircraftAt the aircraftTransferred aircraft meridian through NDB
Airborne weather radarAircraftAt the aircraftTransferred aircraft meridian through plotted object
Reference errorDo not plot an aircraft-measured reciprocal directly from the NDB's own meridian unless chart convergence has first been applied.

Worked routes and chart comparison

13 min read
Written fromR.K. Bali, Air Navigation ch 3, projection comparisonOxford ATPL Book 10, chapter 22 questionsKeith Williams, Lambert projection questions

The final skill is to combine scale, convergence and track relationships without borrowing a Mercator rule at the wrong moment.

Worked longitude from track change

A Lambert chart has n = 0.6. A straight line is 292 degrees true at A and 283 degrees true at B. Its direction has changed by 9 degrees, which equals chart convergence between the two meridians. Change of longitude is 9 divided by 0.6 = 15 degrees. If A is at 12 degrees east and B lies west of A, B is at 3 degrees west.

Worked longitude from rhumb and straight tracks

On a Lambert chart with n = 0.80, the initial straight-line track is 070 degrees true and the rhumb-line track is 082 degrees true. Their difference of 12 degrees is half chart convergence, so full chart convergence is 24 degrees. Change of longitude is 24 divided by 0.80 = 30 degrees. From 4 degrees west eastwards, the destination longitude is 26 degrees east.

PropertyLambert conformalNormal Mercator
MeridiansStraight and convergingStraight, parallel and equally spaced
ParallelsConcentric circular arcsStraight parallel lines
Great circleNearly straight, shallow curve to parallel of originCurve concave to equator, except equator and meridians
Rhumb lineCurved towards pole, except meridiansStraight
ScaleNear constant between well-chosen standard parallelsExpands rapidly with secant latitude
Chart convergenceLongitude change × nZero
Typical useMid-latitude route charts and plottingLow-latitude and rhumb-line plotting

Advantages and disadvantages

Lambert permits practical straight-line great-circle plotting, direct plotting of ground-measured radio bearings and ruler measurement where scale error is small. Its non-rectangular graticule makes position plotting less simple than Mercator, rhumb lines are curved, and aircraft following a great circle needs continuously updated desired track rather than one unchanging compass direction.

One-line summaryOn Lambert, use the local meridian for direction, a graduated meridian for distance, a transferred aircraft meridian for ADF plotting, and treat the straight route as the practical great circle.